Methodology

Understanding the PROMETHEE Method

Decision-making often involves evaluating multiple alternatives based on various criteria.

The PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations) method offers a robust approach to handle such multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) challenges. Central to this method is the concept of pairwise comparisons, which provides a structured framework for evaluating alternatives.

What is the PROMETHEE Method?

PROMETHEE is a multi-criteria decision-making method designed to rank and evaluate a set of alternatives based on multiple criteria. Developed in the early 1980s by Professor Jean-Pierre Brans, this method has since become a popular choice for addressing complex decision-making problems.

Pairwise Comparisons in PROMETHEE

The Essence of Pairwise Comparisons

Pairwise comparison involves comparing two alternatives at a time to determine which one is preferred or to what degree one is preferred over the other. In the context of the PROMETHEE method, these comparisons play a crucial role in determining preference functions.

Process and Significance

Criteria-Based Evaluation: For each criterion, every pair of alternatives is compared. This means that if there are ‘n’ alternatives, there will be ‘n(n-1)/2’ pairwise comparisons.
Preference Determination: For each pairwise comparison, determine which alternative is preferred and possibly the degree of preference. This can be done using various scales, such as numerical or linguistic.
Aggregation in PROMETHEE: Once all pairwise comparisons are made for a criterion, the results can be aggregated to get a global preference score for each alternative for that criterion. This preference value is then used to calculate the positive and negative flows for each alternative, leading to a global ranking.

Key Components of PROMETHEE

Preference Functions

At the heart of PROMETHEE lies the concept of preference functions. These functions quantify the preference of one alternative over another based on a specific criterion. The method offers several types of preference functions, allowing decision-makers to choose the most suitable one for their problem.

Positive and Negative Flows

Once preferences are determined, the method calculates two flows for each alternative:

• Positive Flow (Φ+): Represents how an alternative is preferred over all other alternatives.
• Negative Flow (Φ-): Represents how other alternatives are preferred over the given alternative.

Net Flow

The net flow is the difference between the positive and negative flows. It provides a global ranking of the alternatives. The alternative with the highest net flow is generally considered the best choice.

Advantages of PROMETHEE

Simplicity

PROMETHEE offers a straightforward approach to multi-criteria decision-making, making it accessible even to those unfamiliar with MCDA.

Flexibility

The method’s range of preference functions allows it to be tailored to various decision-making scenarios.

Transparency

The step-by-step process of PROMETHEE ensures transparency, allowing decision-makers to understand and justify their choices.

Comprehensive Analysis

By considering both positive and negative flows, PROMETHEE provides a holistic view of each alternative’s strengths and weaknesses.

Disadvantages of PROMETHEE

Subjectivity in Preference Functions

The choice of preference functions and their parameters can introduce subjectivity, potentially affecting the objectivity of the final decision.

Complexity with Large Data Sets

When dealing with a large number of criteria and alternatives, the method can become computationally intensive and complex.

Potential for Rank Reversal

Changes in the set of alternatives can sometimes lead to rank reversals, where the ranking of existing alternatives changes when a new alternative is added or removed.

Requires Expertise

To effectively utilize PROMETHEE, a certain level of expertise is required, especially in selecting appropriate preference functions and interpreting results.

Conclusion

The PROMETHEE method offers a structured and transparent approach to multi-criteria decision-making. With its combination of simplicity, flexibility, and comprehensiveness, it stands as a valuable tool for organizations seeking to navigate the complexities of decision-making. The concept of pairwise comparisons further enhances its robustness, ensuring detailed and nuanced evaluations of alternatives.

Learn More

Interested in delving deeper into the PROMETHEE method and its potential benefits for your organization? Connect with us for insights or to arrange a consultation.